In an SCI paper, the discussion is where you interpret your results, explain their significance, compare them with existing research, and highlight the novelty of your work. Unlike the results section, which focuses on “what you found,” the discussion answers “why it matters” and “how it advances the field.”

---

1. Start with a Clear Summary of Key Findings

Begin the discussion by briefly restating your most important results in plain language. This helps readers transition from raw data to your interpretation. Keep it concise—usually two to three sentences are enough.

Example:

“This study demonstrated that [key finding], suggesting that [main implication].”

---

2. Compare with Previous Research

Show how your results align with, contradict, or expand on prior studies. Cite relevant literature and explain possible reasons for similarities or differences.

Tips:

• Avoid merely listing other studies; integrate them into your argument.

• Acknowledge both agreements and discrepancies.

---

3. Explain the Mechanisms or Underlying Reasons

Go beyond the “what” to discuss the “why.” If your results suggest a new mechanism, provide plausible explanations based on theory, experiments, or models.

---

4. Highlight Novelty and Contribution

Make it explicit how your work advances the field. This could be a new method, a unique dataset, a novel theoretical insight, or an innovative application.

---

5. Address Limitations Honestly

High-quality SCI discussions acknowledge limitations. This builds credibility and allows other researchers to build upon your work. Common examples include:

• Sample size constraints

• Limited generalizability

• Measurement uncertainties

---

6. Suggest Future Research Directions

End the discussion by pointing to logical next steps. This could involve testing your findings in different conditions, using alternative methods, or expanding the scope of study.

---

7. Keep a Balanced and Academic Tone

Avoid overstatement. Phrases like “the results strongly indicate” are preferable to “this proves.” Maintain objectivity while emphasizing the significance of your work.

---

Pro Tip for SCI Authors:
The discussion section is not just about summarizing—it's your chance to convince readers and reviewers that your research matters. Well-written discussions often lead to higher citation rates and stronger peer-review outcomes.

For more resources on academic writing and publishing strategies, visit iconf.org for curated guides and conference insights.